I have a new Bloomberg column on this subject, I would especially insist on the closest one:
When I think about all this, I try to separate two questions. First, is there a major puzzle to solve? And second, what is the best explanation for this conundrum? It’s helpful to focus on the first question in isolation, because we can’t keep a cool head when it comes to the second.
Accepting that there is a real puzzle to be solved, the Senate Intelligence Committee has made a decisive decision to answer the first question. Once we have clarified exactly what the puzzle is, we may be able to make progress in explaining it.
As for context:
The Senate Intelligence Committee doesn’t believe it. THE Intelligence Authorization Act which he adopted last week, among other stuff calls for review of the Anomaly Resolution Office in all areas. The bill would also limit research into what are now called UAPs (for unidentified anomalous phenomena) unless Congress is informed and add whistleblower protections for anyone who wishes to come forward and speak out. his opinion.
Recommended, I make other points as well.
